Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 11901
Submitted: May 16, 2024 at 1:18:00 PM
First Name: Yasmine
Last Name: Hamze
Pronoun: she her
Preferred Name: Yasmine
Student Number: 20231380
Email: 19ylh2@queensu.ca
Degree Program: bah
Plan: phil
Level of Study: 4
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Code: Phil 351
Term: Winter
Year: 2024
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: Andrew Lopez
Section/Class Number: 351
Component: final exam
Petition Letter
Petition Letter:
My names Yasmine Hamze 20231380 as a student enrolled in phil 351 instructed by Professor Lopez, I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the grading process and lack of professionalism displayed by Professor Lopez. I firmly believe that there have been significant instances of bias, error, and procedural unfairness in the evaluation of my work, particularly evident during the final exam. Additionally, I have encountered unprofessional behavior when seeking assistance or clarity from Professor Lopez.
Throughout the semester, I have diligently worked on assignments, striving to meet the high expectations set by Professor Lopez. However, the feedback provided on my work has been minimal and vague, making it challenging for me to understand how to improve. Despite my efforts to seek guidance and clarification from Professor Lopez on numerous occasions, I was met with dismissiveness and a lack of professionalism.
Despite my best efforts to align with the expectations outlined in the rubric, I consistently received poor marks. Seeking assistance proved futile as my inquiries were dismissed. It feels unjust, as I suspect Professor Lopez found it convenient to grade my final exam harshly based on his perception of my previous work. Despite my attempts to improve with each assignment, I encountered the same vague feedback:
My names Yasmine Hamze 20231380 as a student enrolled in phil 351 instructed by Professor Lopez, I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the grading process and lack of professionalism displayed by Professor Lopez. I firmly believe that there have been significant instances of bias, error, and procedural unfairness in the evaluation of my work, particularly evident during the final exam. Additionally, I have encountered unprofessional behavior when seeking assistance or clarity from Professor Lopez.
Throughout the semester, I have diligently worked on assignments, striving to meet the high expectations set by Professor Lopez. However, the feedback provided on my work has been minimal and vague, making it challenging for me to understand how to improve. Despite my efforts to seek guidance and clarification from Professor Lopez on numerous occasions, I was met with dismissiveness and a lack of professionalism.
Despite my best efforts to align with the expectations outlined in the rubric, I consistently received poor marks. Seeking assistance proved futile as my inquiries were dismissed. It feels unjust, as I suspect Professor Lopez found it convenient to grade my final exam harshly based on his perception of my previous work. Despite my attempts to improve with each assignment, I encountered the same vague feedback:
Documentation
Professional Letter: combinepdf.pdf
Document: extra documenation.pdf