Submit an Academic Petition or Appeal

Manage Appeals

Petition Type: New
ID: 14315
Submitted: May 13, 2026 at 9:51:49 AM
First Name: Adison
Last Name: Emery
Pronoun: She/her
Preferred Name: Adison
Student Number: 20519557
Degree Program: BA
Plan: SOCI
Level of Study: 1

Petition Categories

Petition Categories: Request aegrotat (AG) standing in a course or courses
Code: ENGL 112
Term: Winter
Year: 2026
Petition Category: Request aegrotat (AG) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Gabrielle McIntire
Section/Class Number: W26

Petition Letter

Petition Letter: Aegrotat Standing Petition

Student Name:Adison Emery
Student Number: 20519557
Course:ENGL 112
Term: Winter Term

I am writing to respectfully request Aegrotat (AG) standing for ENGL 112 during the Winter term.

I completed and passed more than 60% of the evaluated coursework in the class. However, because of extenuating circumstances beyond my control, I was unable to successfully complete the remaining course requirements. Throughout the term, I experienced significant health-related challenges connected to documented diagnoses of clinical depression, anxiety, and a learning disability. Although I do not normally disclose specific diagnoses, I am including this information to provide context for the academic difficulties I experienced during the course.

At the start of the term, I proactively reached out to the instructor to confirm my accommodations through Queen’s Student Accessibility Services. Throughout the course, I found myself needing to follow up multiple times regarding how accommodations would be implemented, particularly in relation to participation expectations and occasional absences. During the academic year, I also transitioned between two accessibility advisors. While both advisors were supportive, having to repeatedly explain my accommodations and circumstances added additional stress and administrative burden during a period when I was already struggling academically and personally.

One of the main challenges in this course involved participation-related requirements. An accommodation connected to participation was not consistently reflected in practice, and when I asked about alternatives for a participation-based component, I was advised that the original requirement would still need to be completed, with the option to meet further to discuss it. Repeatedly needing to re-advocate for accommodations that had already been approved became increasingly stressful and affected my ability to fully engage in the course. I had informed the instructor early in the term about my accommodations in relation to the group presentation component. In response, I was encouraged to attempt the assignment, as it involved limited public speaking, group work, and the option to read from a prepared script. While I understood this as encouragement and support, the barriers connected to participation still remained unresolved and continued to impact my ability to complete the requirement.

Across all other completed coursework, I consistently achieved grades in the 60–70% range. The most significant impact on my final grade came from the roundtable group presentation worth 15% and the participation component worth 15%, which together accounted for 30% of the course grade. Given my performance throughout the rest of the course, the final grade does not fully reflect my demonstrated academic performance during the term.

Despite these challenges, I continued to engage with the course, communicate with supports, and make efforts to meet course expectations throughout the term. Ultimately, due to the combination of health-related and accommodation-related barriers, I was unable to complete the remaining course requirements successfully.

Given that I completed the majority of the course and that the remaining work was impacted by documented extenuating circumstances beyond my control, I respectfully request consideration for Aegrotat standing.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Adison Emery
Student Number: 20519557

Documentation

Level 1 Status

Status: Denied

Level 2

Appeal Type: Level 2
ID: 381
Submitted: July 29, 2026 at 8:04:07 AM
Relevant Petition: 14315
Decision(s) Being Appealed: Request aegrotat (AG) standing in a course or courses: ENGL 112, Winter 2026 (Gabrielle McIntire)

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Appeal Grounds Details: Pursuant to Academic Appeal and Petition Regulations, this appeal to the Board of Studies is brought on the grounds of Procedural Unfairness and an Unreasonable Decision regarding Submission #14315 (ENGL 112).

The decision is procedurally unfair and unreasonable on three key counts:

It faults a student registered with Queen's Student Accessibility Services (QSAS) for sporadic attendance while explicitly admitting that the instructor failed to respond to the student's early-term accommodation notice regarding absences.

It treats the instructor's passive

Appeal Letter

Appeal Letter: To: The Board of Studies, Faculty of Arts and Science, Queen’s University (asc.appeals@queensu.ca)

Appellant: Adison Emery

Student ID: 20519557

Student Email: memery@hpedsb.on.ca

Course: ENGL 112 (Winter 2026)

Decision Appealed: Associate Dean Dorit Naaman’s Decision (Submission #14315, Dated July 27, 2026)

I. GROUNDS FOR APPEAL
This appeal is submitted to the Board of Studies requesting a review of the decision rendered by Associate Dean Dorit Naaman on July 27, 2026 (Submission #14315). This appeal is brought pursuant to Faculty regulations on two primary grounds:

Procedural Unfairness & Failure to Apply Accommodations Policy: The decision fails to properly enforce Queen’s Academic Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Policy by holding the student accountable for a lack of formal accommodation structures when the instructor admittedly failed to respond to the student's accommodation notice regarding absences.

Unreasonable and Contradictory Findings: The ruling contains logically inconsistent findings regarding whether essential course learning outcomes were met, given the concurrent finding that a single 5% assessment would allow a passing grade.

II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Registration & Early Notice: I am registered with Queen's Student Accessibility Services (QSAS). As acknowledged in the Associate Dean’s letter, I proactively emailed Instructor Gabrielle McIntire in January 2026 to provide notice of my QSAS status and request accommodations regarding class absences and in-class presentations (worth 30% combined).

Instructor’s Unanswered Communication: The decision explicitly states:

Documentation

Edit Appeal
Select a decision letter template to generate and queue a decision letter using its content.

History

Originally submitted May 13, 2026 at 9:51:49 AM.

FieldReferenceOld ValueNew ValueNoteUserDate/Time
statusN/AReceivedIncompleteKerri Andrews2026-06-11 9:58:00 AM
statusN/AIncompleteIn ReviewKerri Andrews2026-07-03 1:45:59 PM
statusN/AIn ReviewDeniedKerri Andrews2026-07-27 8:57:32 AM
associate_deanN/ADorit Naaman (Associate Dean Academic)Kerri Andrews2026-07-27 8:57:32 AM
decision_letterN/AN/ADecision letter sentKerri Andrews2026-07-27 8:59:32 AM
new_appeal_level_2N/ALevel 2Level 2 Appeal ID: 38124gyv2026-07-29 8:04:07 AM
statusN/AReceivedIn ReviewKathrine Scott2026-07-30 3:14:53 PM