Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 2917
Submitted: December 20, 2016 at 4:23:34 PM
First Name: Michael
Last Name: Edwards
Student Number: 3640209
Email: 0mme1@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BSc
Plan: LISC
Level of Study: 3
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Code: ECON 112
Term: Fall
Year: 2016
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: Wing Ying Feng
Component: Final Exam
Code: EMPR 220
Term: Fall
Year: 2016
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: John Staples
Component: Final Exam
Code: EMPR 220
Term: Fall
Year: 2016
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: John Staples
Component: Assignment (2nd & last)
Petition Letter
Petition Letter: Date: 20th December 2016
Student ID: 03640209
Re: Appeal Letter
Dear Associate Dean,
I would like to appeal on following grounds:
1. I would like to defer my examination for ECON 112 to the New Year.
2. I would like to defer my examination for EMPR 220 to the New Year.
3. I would like to appeal the grade on the second and last assignment for EMPR 220.
During the examination period the weather and road conditions in Toronto were too bad. The snow storm was announced on the news stations and lasted the entire week. I informed the CDS team that I would not be able to attend the ECON 112 and EMPR 220 examinations. I also sort advice from my instructors before the exam and on the day. Dr. Staples responded and said that I should file an appeal according to the instructions of Ms. Monica Desjardins. Today, I sent both instructions a form for the Permission for an Incomplete Grade or Deferred Examination to request a deferral, and I have not heard back from them. (See Faculty of Arts and Science Regulation 10.2.4)
I would like to request that my last assignment in EMPR 220 is amended without the penalty, because I did not quite understand that I should get back to my instructor after my initial letter. My initial letter requested a few more hours as an extension. Because I did not receive an email response directly from the instructor, I assumed that I should just hand in the assignment after the weekend. Apparently, after discussing this with the instructor, I should have written another letter to request more time. Similarly, I would like to request that my 2nd assignment in EMPR 220 is reread because I feel that it could have achieved some more credit.
I look forward to hearing from you, and thank you in advance,
Yours sincerely
Michael Edwards
Student ID: 03640209
Re: Appeal Letter
Dear Associate Dean,
I would like to appeal on following grounds:
1. I would like to defer my examination for ECON 112 to the New Year.
2. I would like to defer my examination for EMPR 220 to the New Year.
3. I would like to appeal the grade on the second and last assignment for EMPR 220.
During the examination period the weather and road conditions in Toronto were too bad. The snow storm was announced on the news stations and lasted the entire week. I informed the CDS team that I would not be able to attend the ECON 112 and EMPR 220 examinations. I also sort advice from my instructors before the exam and on the day. Dr. Staples responded and said that I should file an appeal according to the instructions of Ms. Monica Desjardins. Today, I sent both instructions a form for the Permission for an Incomplete Grade or Deferred Examination to request a deferral, and I have not heard back from them. (See Faculty of Arts and Science Regulation 10.2.4)
I would like to request that my last assignment in EMPR 220 is amended without the penalty, because I did not quite understand that I should get back to my instructor after my initial letter. My initial letter requested a few more hours as an extension. Because I did not receive an email response directly from the instructor, I assumed that I should just hand in the assignment after the weekend. Apparently, after discussing this with the instructor, I should have written another letter to request more time. Similarly, I would like to request that my 2nd assignment in EMPR 220 is reread because I feel that it could have achieved some more credit.
I look forward to hearing from you, and thank you in advance,
Yours sincerely
Michael Edwards
Documentation
Documentation Detail: Letter to CDS and Professor in ECON 112
Document: Re_ EMPR 220 - Michael Edwards.pdf
Documentation Detail: Letter to CDS and Professor in EMPR 220
Amendment to Appeal 2917
Relevant Petition: 2917
New Information: Dear Associate Dean,
As regards PSYC 100, I would like to appeal the assignment 2 that was poorly marked. The teaching assistant (Irene Hong) appeared to have a lack of comprehension and standards. The feedback was unethical and prejudicial at this point.
I would like the exams to be reviewed because, I have very good grades in other work that is related to my degree(s). The class has been asked to wait until January 9th, 2017 to obtain a copy of the examination and an informal review.
Specifically, I would like to appeal the Proctored Mid-Year examination taken at the University of Toronto because the marks are not consistent with my previous results in the Mid-term Quiz, assignments, and quizzes. I would like the Faculty to be reviewed because, I have very good grades in other work that is related to my degree(s). The class has been asked to wait until January 9th, 2017 to obtain a copy of the examination and an informal review.
My marks are not consistent with my best efforts. In the past, I know there are usually mistakes in the Psychology department. The Scantron information was originally written in pen by mistake, so I had to rewrite it in pencil. I would like to check the multiple choice and any essay questions and I would also like to receive a copy of the exams.
Please, could you add this information to my appeal
Yours sincerely
Michael Edwards
As regards PSYC 100, I would like to appeal the assignment 2 that was poorly marked. The teaching assistant (Irene Hong) appeared to have a lack of comprehension and standards. The feedback was unethical and prejudicial at this point.
I would like the exams to be reviewed because, I have very good grades in other work that is related to my degree(s). The class has been asked to wait until January 9th, 2017 to obtain a copy of the examination and an informal review.
Specifically, I would like to appeal the Proctored Mid-Year examination taken at the University of Toronto because the marks are not consistent with my previous results in the Mid-term Quiz, assignments, and quizzes. I would like the Faculty to be reviewed because, I have very good grades in other work that is related to my degree(s). The class has been asked to wait until January 9th, 2017 to obtain a copy of the examination and an informal review.
My marks are not consistent with my best efforts. In the past, I know there are usually mistakes in the Psychology department. The Scantron information was originally written in pen by mistake, so I had to rewrite it in pencil. I would like to check the multiple choice and any essay questions and I would also like to receive a copy of the exams.
Please, could you add this information to my appeal
Yours sincerely
Michael Edwards
Student Number: 3640209
Documentation
Professional Letter Detail: Exams and Emails
Documentation Detail: Emails
History
Originally submitted December 20, 2016 at 4:23:34 PM.
| Field | Reference | Old Value | New Value | Note | User | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| status | N/A | Received | Prepared for Review | Carrie Roosenmaalen | 2016-12-21 9:14:57 AM | |
| status | N/A | Prepared for Review | Withdrawn | no appeal required | Haley Everson | 2017-01-12 3:28:00 PM |