Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 6149
Submitted: September 13, 2019 at 8:41:59 PM
First Name: Reuben
Last Name: Fleming
Student Number: 20019284
Email: 15rmf1@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: PHIL
Level of Study: 4
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Code: PSYC 370
Term: Winter
Year: 2019
Petition Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Janet Menard
Petition Letter
Petition Letter: Dear, whomever it may concern,
Today I am requesting that ¿Credit Standing¿¿ status be applied to my grade from PSYC 370 which I took during the winter of 2019. There are several reasons I believe this request is reasonable, and I hope to successfully relate those reasons to you in the following letter.
Firstly, after receiving a poor grade for the first midterm examination, I did not feel that I had sufficient information to justify making any request regarding the dropping of the course in question, or to request pass/fail grading status for this course. This was due to the fact that at the time that I took the first midterm, I was recovering from the flu. Consequently, I later considered my low grade in that midterm to not be at all indicative of academic performance in the course as a whole. After taking the second mid-term examination in PSYC 370 and again not doing well in my estimation, I spoke to an academic advisor about changing my status in relation to this course, but the deadlines for making changes to courses had passed. I had intended to have the course be changed to a pass/fail grading or drop the course entirely.
I found that, as a philosophy major, the content of PSYC 370 was prohibitively advanced. So much so that I am puzzled as to how BAH students are allowed to take this class in the first place. And while I did take the preamble class to PSYC 370, PSYC 271, I found this left me woefully unprepared for the amount of assumed technical knowledge required in PSYC 370. Moreover, I know that I am far from alone in this analysis. I did, multiple times, reach out to my professor after class for clarification of material which yielded little success in furthering my understanding. Furthermore, the professor¿¿s 50-minute presentations were made even more difficult to follow since they would frequently involve 20+ minutes of personal anecdotes about the professor's life which as someone paying to be in this class I found unacceptable.
Lastly, in light of my responsibilities as an Academic Events Coordinator and as a Queen¿¿s University Senator, and considering the fact that I was campaigning at the time for the position I currently hold as a Philosophy Department Student Council President, I found myself temporarily overwhelmed with many new responsibilities, and was subsequently ill-equipped to deal with a problematic course experience based around content which fell well outside of my knowledge base.
As a student who is near complete visual blindness, I have faced many challenges throughout my academic journey. However, I have never made an academic appeal. This is because I believe that I should embrace true reflections of my character and ability. The grade I received in PSYC 370 last winter is not at all congruent with my other grades from last year, and it is not a true reflection of my character or abilities for the reasons stated above.
I thank you for your consideration, and ask that you keep in mind that I work hard for my grades; they do not come easily, and I appreciate their value. Hence, I am not requesting that you give me a grade that I do not deserve, I am asking that you remove one.
All the best.
Today I am requesting that ¿Credit Standing¿¿ status be applied to my grade from PSYC 370 which I took during the winter of 2019. There are several reasons I believe this request is reasonable, and I hope to successfully relate those reasons to you in the following letter.
Firstly, after receiving a poor grade for the first midterm examination, I did not feel that I had sufficient information to justify making any request regarding the dropping of the course in question, or to request pass/fail grading status for this course. This was due to the fact that at the time that I took the first midterm, I was recovering from the flu. Consequently, I later considered my low grade in that midterm to not be at all indicative of academic performance in the course as a whole. After taking the second mid-term examination in PSYC 370 and again not doing well in my estimation, I spoke to an academic advisor about changing my status in relation to this course, but the deadlines for making changes to courses had passed. I had intended to have the course be changed to a pass/fail grading or drop the course entirely.
I found that, as a philosophy major, the content of PSYC 370 was prohibitively advanced. So much so that I am puzzled as to how BAH students are allowed to take this class in the first place. And while I did take the preamble class to PSYC 370, PSYC 271, I found this left me woefully unprepared for the amount of assumed technical knowledge required in PSYC 370. Moreover, I know that I am far from alone in this analysis. I did, multiple times, reach out to my professor after class for clarification of material which yielded little success in furthering my understanding. Furthermore, the professor¿¿s 50-minute presentations were made even more difficult to follow since they would frequently involve 20+ minutes of personal anecdotes about the professor's life which as someone paying to be in this class I found unacceptable.
Lastly, in light of my responsibilities as an Academic Events Coordinator and as a Queen¿¿s University Senator, and considering the fact that I was campaigning at the time for the position I currently hold as a Philosophy Department Student Council President, I found myself temporarily overwhelmed with many new responsibilities, and was subsequently ill-equipped to deal with a problematic course experience based around content which fell well outside of my knowledge base.
As a student who is near complete visual blindness, I have faced many challenges throughout my academic journey. However, I have never made an academic appeal. This is because I believe that I should embrace true reflections of my character and ability. The grade I received in PSYC 370 last winter is not at all congruent with my other grades from last year, and it is not a true reflection of my character or abilities for the reasons stated above.
I thank you for your consideration, and ask that you keep in mind that I work hard for my grades; they do not come easily, and I appreciate their value. Hence, I am not requesting that you give me a grade that I do not deserve, I am asking that you remove one.
All the best.
Documentation
Professional Letter Detail: I have no relevant documentation for upload. Due to the nature of my appeal, there is no supporting documentation available.
Documentation Detail: I have no relevant documentation for upload. Due to the nature of my appeal, there is no supporting documentation available.
Decision Letters
History
Originally submitted September 13, 2019 at 8:41:59 PM.
| Field | Reference | Old Value | New Value | Note | User | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| status | N/A | Received | Prepared for Review | Carrie Roosenmaalen | 2019-09-16 9:58:08 AM | |
| status | N/A | Prepared for Review | Incomplete | Kerri Andrews | 2019-09-16 12:04:26 PM | |
| status | N/A | Incomplete | In Review | Kerri Andrews | 2019-09-16 1:24:08 PM | |
| status | N/A | In Review | Denied | Spring Forsberg | 2019-09-23 10:00:21 AM | |
| associate_dean | N/A | Jenn Stephenson, Ph.D. | Spring Forsberg | 2019-09-23 10:00:21 AM | ||
| decision_letter | N/A | N/A | Decision letter sent | Spring Forsberg | 2019-09-23 10:01:03 AM |

