Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 7327
Submitted: January 27, 2021 at 1:34:43 PM
First Name: quinby
Last Name: white
Student Number: 20015169
Email: 15qw15@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: ENVS and HLTH
Level of Study: 4
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Code: HLTH 315
Term: Fall
Year: 2020
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: Dr. Amy Latimer-Cheung
Component: Assignment
Petition Letter
Petition Letter: January 27th, 2021
To the Associate Deans (Studies):
I am appealing my final grade of 84.4 in HLTH 315 F20. Specifically, the grade that I received for Part A of the final assignment.
The final assignment was in 2 parts: Part A case study (15) and Part B program based on case study (40). I had worked diligently on both assignments. Part A laid the foundation of demographic information and rationale that I used in Part B. I had received a B+ on Part A (the case study) and an A on part B (the program). I believe that the B+ is not representative of the work that I have done.
With regards to the Part A assignment in particular, I had emailed my TA about the faulty recorded tutorial link explaining the assignment of Part A. He said he would look into this issue, but a new link was never provided. Throughout the semester, he typically took 4 or more days to respond to emails, even after the assignment deadlines had already passed.
I have been attempting to contact my TA since the marks were starting to be released on OnQ. After no response, I emailed the course email and Dr. Latimer-Cheung¿¿s personal email regarding my concern, at this time the final mark was up on Solus, and have only received a single email reply in the month of January. Dr. Latimer-Cheung said that she only rounded up marks of 0.50 or above to the nearest whole mark and did not address my concerns with the B+ mark for Part A of the final assignment.
I wish to appeal the mark in this course because I feel that I am deserving of a final mark of an A.
To the Associate Deans (Studies):
I am appealing my final grade of 84.4 in HLTH 315 F20. Specifically, the grade that I received for Part A of the final assignment.
The final assignment was in 2 parts: Part A case study (15) and Part B program based on case study (40). I had worked diligently on both assignments. Part A laid the foundation of demographic information and rationale that I used in Part B. I had received a B+ on Part A (the case study) and an A on part B (the program). I believe that the B+ is not representative of the work that I have done.
With regards to the Part A assignment in particular, I had emailed my TA about the faulty recorded tutorial link explaining the assignment of Part A. He said he would look into this issue, but a new link was never provided. Throughout the semester, he typically took 4 or more days to respond to emails, even after the assignment deadlines had already passed.
I have been attempting to contact my TA since the marks were starting to be released on OnQ. After no response, I emailed the course email and Dr. Latimer-Cheung¿¿s personal email regarding my concern, at this time the final mark was up on Solus, and have only received a single email reply in the month of January. Dr. Latimer-Cheung said that she only rounded up marks of 0.50 or above to the nearest whole mark and did not address my concerns with the B+ mark for Part A of the final assignment.
I wish to appeal the mark in this course because I feel that I am deserving of a final mark of an A.
Documentation
Professional Letter: Report-2.docx
Professional Letter Detail: Part B rationale for my program
Document: U3 P1.docx
Documentation Detail: Part A assignment
Document: Report-2-0.docx
Documentation Detail: Part B program
Document: Screen Shot 2021-01-27 at 1.27.09 PM.png
Documentation Detail: Graded rubric for Part A
Document: Screen Shot 2021-01-27 at 1.27.47 PM.png
Documentation Detail: 1st half of the graded rubric for Part B
Decision Letters
History
Originally submitted January 27, 2021 at 1:34:43 PM.
| Field | Reference | Old Value | New Value | Note | User | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| status | N/A | Received | In Review | Spring Forsberg | 2021-01-28 3:36:55 PM | |
| status | N/A | In Review | Denied | Spring Forsberg | 2021-02-17 9:17:10 AM | |
| associate_dean | N/A | Jenn Stephenson, Ph.D. | Spring Forsberg | 2021-02-17 9:17:10 AM | ||
| decision_letter | N/A | N/A | Decision letter sent | Spring Forsberg | 2021-02-17 9:18:44 AM |

