Submit an Academic Petition or Appeal

Manage Appeals

Petition Type: New
ID: 10272
Submitted: April 6, 2023 at 8:25:56 PM
First Name: Amy
Last Name: Owen
Pronoun: She/Her
Student Number: 20196872
Degree Program: Bachelor of History
Plan: History
Level of Study: 2

Petition Categories

Petition Categories: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: CLST 205
Term: Summer
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: ARTH 250
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: HIST 270
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: MUSC 171
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: EMPR 200
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: BADR 101
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline

Petition Letter

Petition Letter: To Queen??s University Appeals Office

I am appealing to drop several failed and several ongoing classes due to circumstances outside of my control. I understand that this will have a setback on the timeline I was aiming to complete my studies but I believe I will have a better time going forward. I have met with Jenna Kring who advised me to pursue this path, she was also able to connect me with Gail Motut who was able to provide me with other support and suggested I meet with the OSAP advisor Angela Street. I met with them over the month of March and we have made the plan that this is the best course of action going forward. I have follow-up meetings as well later in April.
The class I am petitioning to drop in the Summer 2022 Term is Ancient Humour 205. I passed other classes that term but failed that one. I had and then recovered from Surgery during that period. The classes I am petitioning to drop from the Fall 2022 term are Art, Society and Culture 250 and Contemporary China 270. I fell ill during the November period that left me very weak and tired during this period. I could not put my time or energy into each of my classes. The classes I am looking to drop during the Winter 2023 Term are Social History Popular Music 171, Unions and Labour Relations 200 and Acting Globally 101. I was laid off in the January, got pneumonia in January and covid in February and was told in March I would have to have another surgery, the exact date I am still waiting on. After speaking to Jenna about my current situation she advised me that this was the best course of action.
I hope the Office will approve this request given the ongoing and unexpected issues I have faced. I have provided the supporting documents for the issues mentioned above.
Thank you
Amy Owen

Documentation

Professional Letter: Medical Letter-4.pdf
Professional Letter Detail: Doctor note
Documentation Detail: Termination letter
Document: Letter-19.pdf
Documentation Detail: Physio Therapy Note May 2022

Level 1 Status

Status: Granted with Conditions

Level 2

Appeal Type: Level 2
ID: 128
Submitted: May 25, 2023 at 7:30:04 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Decision(s) Being Appealed: Drop a course after the academic deadline: MUSC 171, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: EMPR 200, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: BADR 101, Winter 2023

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Appeal Letter

Appeal Letter: Dear Academic Dean Jen

I am writing this appeal letter in regards to the response of dropping my Winter Term Classes of 2023. The response in my first petition was to not allow the drop as the circumstances did not fit the timeline correctly. In this letter and the following documents I will be providing new evidence that was not available at the time of the first petition, that I believe should allow for a new examination of the appeal.
I had my second surgery for my medical condition at the end of April, I was told about this surgery early this year and had my first appointment to talk about if I was a candidate for the surgery in January, I was then sent for X Rays and had my follow up in February. I was told that we could go ahead with the surgery but it was a waiting game as to when. To my surprise I had my Pre-surgical appointment March 22nd, after that my mind was fully on my health and those needs rather than fully on my school work. During this same period I contacted the Academic Advisors and had an appointment to see what I could do and she advised me to petition to drop classes after the drop date as that had passed. I had the surgery at the end of April and hopefully will start physiotherapy soon for the recovery. During this period I also caught pneumonia and a few weeks later got COVID-19 which messed with my diabetic medical condition as well. In addition I have been experiencing heart health issues as well which I brushed off for a bit but have finally made an appointment with my family doctor to get a referral to a cardiologist hopefully.
My health needs take a large amount of my focus and often due to that dates fall through the cracks such as the date to drop classes. In addition to all of this my health insurance is only available to me if I am enrolled in a minimum of 6 credits in the Fall and 6 credits in the Winter semesters for schooling, as such losing my health insurance would put me out of pocket for a large amount of money each month for healthcare needs. I am in the process of applying for ODSP but it takes a while to submit the application and get a response.
I am appealing the decision in hopes of either getting the classes dropped so that I do not have to withdraw or to see if I would be able to take classes at another school knowing that they would not count towards my credits here.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Amy Owen

Documentation

Document: CampusNote.jpg
I plan to submit additional documentation at a later date: I do possibly plan on submitting more paperwork if needed, on or around June 1st as I have another DOctor Appointment that day relating to both heart issues mentioned and my permanent ongoing medical condition (Type 1 Diabetes)
Select a decision letter template to generate and queue a decision letter using its content.

Level 2 Amendments

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 131
Submitted: June 2, 2023 at 11:14:14 AM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have included a letter explaining the new information I have received regarding some ongoing medical issues.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 132
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:29:31 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 133
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:29:37 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 134
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:30:24 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 135
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:30:30 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 136
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:31:13 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 137
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:32:31 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 138
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:32:56 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 139
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:33:07 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 140
Submitted: June 9, 2023 at 12:21:53 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 141
Submitted: June 9, 2023 at 12:22:52 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

History

Originally submitted April 6, 2023 at 8:25:56 PM.

FieldReferenceOld ValueNew ValueNoteUserDate/Time
appeal_categoryN/AWaive the 21-day or one term deadlineDrop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseCLST 205CLST 205Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termCLST 205SummerKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearCLST 2052022Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseCLST 205Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseARTH 250ARTH 250Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termARTH 250FallKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearARTH 2502022Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseARTH 250Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseHIST 270HIST 270Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termHIST 270FallKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearHIST 2702022Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseHIST 270Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseMUSC 171MUSC 171Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termMUSC 171WinterKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearMUSC 1712023Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseMUSC 171Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseEMPR 200EMPR 200Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termEMPR 200WinterKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearEMPR 2002023Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseEMPR 200Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
courseBADR 101BADR 101Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
termBADR 101WinterKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
yearBADR 1012023Kerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
appeal_category_per_courseBADR 101Drop a course after the academic deadlineKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:38 PM
statusN/AReceivedIncompleteKerri Andrews2023-04-10 4:23:47 PM
statusN/AIncompleteIn ReviewKerri Andrews2023-05-03 1:49:01 PM
statusN/AIn ReviewGranted with ConditionsKerri Andrews2023-05-15 11:00:23 AM
associate_deanN/AJenn Stephenson, Ph.D.Kerri Andrews2023-05-15 11:00:23 AM
decision_letterN/AN/ADecision letter sentKerri Andrews2023-05-15 11:01:11 AM
new_appeal_level_2N/ALevel 2Level 2 Appeal ID: 12819aeo32023-05-25 7:30:04 PM
new_appeal_level_2N/ALevel 2 AmendmentLevel 2 Appeal ID: 13119aeo32023-06-02 11:14:14 AM
statusN/AReceivedDeniedPamela Briand2023-07-20 9:58:48 AM
decision_letterN/AN/ADecision letter sentPamela Briand2023-07-20 10:00:58 AM