Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 10272
Submitted: April 6, 2023 at 8:25:56 PM
First Name: Amy
Last Name: Owen
Pronoun: She/Her
Student Number: 20196872
Email: 19aeo3@queensu.ca
Degree Program: Bachelor of History
Plan: History
Level of Study: 2
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: CLST 205
Term: Summer
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: ARTH 250
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: HIST 270
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: MUSC 171
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: EMPR 200
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Code: BADR 101
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Level 1 Status
Status: Granted with ConditionsLevel 2
Appeal Type: Level 2
ID: 128
Submitted: May 25, 2023 at 7:30:04 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Decision(s) Being Appealed: Drop a course after the academic deadline: MUSC 171, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: EMPR 200, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: BADR 101, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: EMPR 200, Winter 2023
Drop a course after the academic deadline: BADR 101, Winter 2023
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Appeal Letter
Appeal Letter: Dear Academic Dean Jen
I am writing this appeal letter in regards to the response of dropping my Winter Term Classes of 2023. The response in my first petition was to not allow the drop as the circumstances did not fit the timeline correctly. In this letter and the following documents I will be providing new evidence that was not available at the time of the first petition, that I believe should allow for a new examination of the appeal.
I had my second surgery for my medical condition at the end of April, I was told about this surgery early this year and had my first appointment to talk about if I was a candidate for the surgery in January, I was then sent for X Rays and had my follow up in February. I was told that we could go ahead with the surgery but it was a waiting game as to when. To my surprise I had my Pre-surgical appointment March 22nd, after that my mind was fully on my health and those needs rather than fully on my school work. During this same period I contacted the Academic Advisors and had an appointment to see what I could do and she advised me to petition to drop classes after the drop date as that had passed. I had the surgery at the end of April and hopefully will start physiotherapy soon for the recovery. During this period I also caught pneumonia and a few weeks later got COVID-19 which messed with my diabetic medical condition as well. In addition I have been experiencing heart health issues as well which I brushed off for a bit but have finally made an appointment with my family doctor to get a referral to a cardiologist hopefully.
My health needs take a large amount of my focus and often due to that dates fall through the cracks such as the date to drop classes. In addition to all of this my health insurance is only available to me if I am enrolled in a minimum of 6 credits in the Fall and 6 credits in the Winter semesters for schooling, as such losing my health insurance would put me out of pocket for a large amount of money each month for healthcare needs. I am in the process of applying for ODSP but it takes a while to submit the application and get a response.
I am appealing the decision in hopes of either getting the classes dropped so that I do not have to withdraw or to see if I would be able to take classes at another school knowing that they would not count towards my credits here.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Amy Owen
I am writing this appeal letter in regards to the response of dropping my Winter Term Classes of 2023. The response in my first petition was to not allow the drop as the circumstances did not fit the timeline correctly. In this letter and the following documents I will be providing new evidence that was not available at the time of the first petition, that I believe should allow for a new examination of the appeal.
I had my second surgery for my medical condition at the end of April, I was told about this surgery early this year and had my first appointment to talk about if I was a candidate for the surgery in January, I was then sent for X Rays and had my follow up in February. I was told that we could go ahead with the surgery but it was a waiting game as to when. To my surprise I had my Pre-surgical appointment March 22nd, after that my mind was fully on my health and those needs rather than fully on my school work. During this same period I contacted the Academic Advisors and had an appointment to see what I could do and she advised me to petition to drop classes after the drop date as that had passed. I had the surgery at the end of April and hopefully will start physiotherapy soon for the recovery. During this period I also caught pneumonia and a few weeks later got COVID-19 which messed with my diabetic medical condition as well. In addition I have been experiencing heart health issues as well which I brushed off for a bit but have finally made an appointment with my family doctor to get a referral to a cardiologist hopefully.
My health needs take a large amount of my focus and often due to that dates fall through the cracks such as the date to drop classes. In addition to all of this my health insurance is only available to me if I am enrolled in a minimum of 6 credits in the Fall and 6 credits in the Winter semesters for schooling, as such losing my health insurance would put me out of pocket for a large amount of money each month for healthcare needs. I am in the process of applying for ODSP but it takes a while to submit the application and get a response.
I am appealing the decision in hopes of either getting the classes dropped so that I do not have to withdraw or to see if I would be able to take classes at another school knowing that they would not count towards my credits here.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Amy Owen
Documentation
Document: CampusNote.jpg
Document: PrePaperwork March.jpg
Document: Dischargepaperwork.jpg
Document: AdminPaperwork.jpg
I plan to submit additional documentation at a later date: I do possibly plan on submitting more paperwork if needed, on or around June 1st as I have another DOctor Appointment that day relating to both heart issues mentioned and my permanent ongoing medical condition (Type 1 Diabetes)
Decision Letters
Level 2 Amendments
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 131
Submitted: June 2, 2023 at 11:14:14 AM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have included a letter explaining the new information I have received regarding some ongoing medical issues.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Document: Dear Academic Dean.pdf
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 132
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:29:31 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 133
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:29:37 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 134
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:30:24 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 135
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:30:30 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
New Information: I have an off campus doctors form filled out regarding the Heart issues i've mentioned before.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 136
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:31:13 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 137
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:32:31 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 138
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:32:56 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 139
Submitted: June 8, 2023 at 10:33:07 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 140
Submitted: June 9, 2023 at 12:21:53 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 141
Submitted: June 9, 2023 at 12:22:52 PM
Relevant Petition: 10272
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

