Submit an Academic Petition or Appeal

Manage Appeals

Petition Type: New
ID: 11060
Submitted: October 31, 2023 at 11:30:50 AM
First Name: Abha
Last Name: Shah
Pronoun: she/her
Student Number: 20125974
Degree Program: BSCH
Plan: BIPS
Level of Study: 4

Petition Categories

Petition Categories: Waive the 21-day or one term deadline

Level 1 Status

Status: Denied

Level 2

Appeal Type: Level 2
ID: 257
Submitted: December 15, 2023 at 12:07:17 PM
Relevant Petition: 11060
Decision(s) Being Appealed: Waive the 21-day or one term deadline

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Appeal Grounds Details: I am appealing the Associate Dean’s decision to deny my appeal to waive the 1-Year Petition
Deadline on the ground that the Associate Dean did not make a reasonable decision. To my understanding, the reason my appeal was denied was because my academic transcript and appeal letter did not suggest an incapacity to submit a request earlier. I have outlined the timeline and severity of my extenuating circumstances and have provided detail on why I was not able to submit the petition earlier in this appeal letter, and have included some details missing from my original appeal letter. I believe that the reality of my extenuating circumstances was not wholly understood when a decision was being made. I also believe that in following procedural fairness, the context of the situation was not completely paid attention to.

Appeal Letter

Appeal Letter: Although I was academically successful in the time period I could have submitted an appeal, I do not believe that should not be an indication of the severity of my extenuating circumstances. I was only academically successful due to the accommodations provided to me by QSAS. I have had to travel to India twice to attend to ailing family members while receiving treatment for my disability. As I outlined in my petition letter, my time was either spent attending to my academic responsibilities or receiving treatment for my mental health. I am diagnosed with Generalized Anxiety Disorder and have dealt with tremendous anxiety for the past two years. I have been experiencing extenuating circumstances since January of 2022, and my symptoms were exacerbated by disagreements with faculty which gave me a lot of anxiety and prevented me from appealing the course. Furthermore, I contracted COVID when I was writing the final paper for the course and was dealing with post-COVID symptoms by the time I received my grade. Despite completing the deliverables, I was given an F and no explanation despite attempts at communicating with the professor. In the summer of 2022, I had to travel to India to attend to my sister, who was unwell due to her mental health. Upon returning to Canada in Fall 2022, I admitted myself to the emergency room at Trillium Hospitals in Mississauga for my suicidal ideation. I have struggled every step of the way but still attended to my academic responsibilities. These issues still remain prominent this year and have been exacerbated by my father’s illness. He had been unwell for the most of the year of 2023, requiring triple bypass surgery in June 2023. Since then I have been my father’s sole caretaker, travelling to Mississauga every month to take care of him while completing a full course load. I have also taken courses every single semester for over two years because I am greatly motivated to complete my degree. My academic records also demonstrate how much I struggled my first two years at university, and it has taken great courage and determination for me to be able to take a full course load every semester since 2021. I have done this only because I was focused on receiving treatment and due to the accommodations set in place for me. I indicated in my letter that I planned to take another course instead of appealing this course as I was too anxious to submit an appeal. However, I was advised against taking more courses by my QSAS advisor, who said I should take a break given how pervasive my extenuating circumstances were. I still took another course but had to withdraw once I received the news of my father’s illness, for which I also had to quit my role at the ASD lab and travel to India. I was not comfortable divulging all this information, but was disheartened when I learned that my appeal was denied and felt the need to clarify on appeal. I believe my success should not be seen as an absence of my extenuating circumstances but as evidence of my commitment to completing my education. I am of the opinion that the Associate Dean’s decision was not reasonable given that I demonstrated that my extenuating circumstances were ongoing but due to my academic success, it was assumed that my circumstances were not dire enough to not have submitted an appeal earlier. I would also like to reiterate that this one course prevents me from graduating and could potentially result in the loss of a job offer in January. I believe it is greatly unfair that despite completing my course deliverables and all the requirements for my degree, I will be asked to take another semester because my disability prevented me from appealing this course. The only reason that I am able to submit an appeal now is because my circumstances have finally subsided in severity. I would sincerely request the Board of Studies to take all the facts into consideration when reviewing my appeal and making a decision on my request to waive the 1-Year Petition deadline.



Documentation

I plan to submit additional documentation at a later date: I plan to submit a letter from my therapist whose treatment I have been under since 2021.

Level 2 Amendment

Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 261
Submitted: January 17, 2024 at 8:50:33 AM
Relevant Petition: 11060
New Information: I am attaching a letter my father wrote to the Health Ombudsman regarding the lack of care me and my sister have received. This letter demonstrates that my sister has been experiencing severe health issues, which have been a persisting extenuating circumstance for me. The letter is dated in 2023, which also demonstrates that these issues had not stopped by the time the deadline had passed. I was dealing with these circumstances while undergoing mental health issues I myself was not receiving adequate care for. I chose to focus on my academic career as I could not afford to be a bad student, given that I was supposed to graduate in 2022. This, again, should not reflect a lack of extenuating circumstances or me overcoming my disability. I plead the Board to consider these circumstances when making their decision.

Appeal Grounds

Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
  • The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
    • Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.

Documentation

Document: Letter 1.png