Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 11348
Submitted: December 31, 2023 at 11:48:11 PM
First Name: YAO
Last Name: SUN
Pronoun: She/her
Student Number: 20356433
Email: 21ys123@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: UNDECLEARED
Level of Study: 2
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Code: MATH 121
Term: Fall/Winter
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Ping Li
Code: STAT 263
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Charles Molson
Code: ECON 112
Term: Winter
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Ugurhan Berkok
Code: DEVS 101
Term: Summer
Year: 2023
Petition Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor's Name: Marcus Taylor
Level 1 Status
Status: Granted with ConditionsLevel 2
Appeal Type: Level 2
ID: 263
Submitted: February 3, 2024 at 12:08:24 AM
Relevant Petition: 11348
Decision(s) Being Appealed: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses: MATH 121, Fall/Winter 2022 (Ping Li)
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Appeal Grounds Details: I am appealing the Associate Dean’s decision to deny my appeal of Credit Standing for Course MATH121(22F/23W) on the grounds that, while the Associate Dean’s decision followed the university rules and regulations, it was not “thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts”. The Associate Dean should have informed me that “your low grades in MATH121 did not correlate with the academic impacts of your extenuating circumstance as confirmed with in the documentation you supplied” and requested for a qualified documentation before given the decision, especially considering that I have already mentioned the unexpected circumstance regarding that the acquisition of my professional document was beyond my control in the First Level Appeal Letter.
Appeal Letter
Appeal Letter: Dear Members of the Board of Studies and Associate Dean,
The circumstances of my initial appeal involved a sudden cancellation of the appointment by my psychiatrist on December 21st, the last day of Fall term. The cancellation email which I received at 8am on the day of appointment is provided as document to prove the situation is out of my control. This prompted me to seek assistance from a social worker at Student Wellness to get the documentation for First level Appeal in order to meet the deadline (December 31st). The social worker, whom I had never met before, provided documentation based on my past visits at Student Wellness. However, due to her unfamiliarity with me, the documentation lacks details and information regarding the impacts of my depression and anxiety on my Math121 course and my performance on exams.
In my Second Level Appeal, I aim to provide new and relevant documentation addressing the specific circumstances that influenced my MATH121 course and exams performance. However, since the time constraint to submit the Second Level Appeal is only 10 business days, and considering the availability of my mental health professional, I kindly request your understanding in waiting until February 10th for the submission of all the updated and comprehensive documentations. The earliest availability of my psychiatrist is on February 8th.
Initially, the final exams of Fall 2022(including MATH121) were usually taken in gyms or halls that held about 200-300 people, and the exposure to crowded places intensified my anxiety disorder. These exams took place before I registered and receiving support with QSAS, which allowed me to take exam in a smaller room.
In addition to my usual symptoms of depression and anxiety, such as difficulty in concentrating, memorizing, and comprehension, the increase of anxiety and depression caused me to exhibit physical symptoms of trembling on right hand and eating disorders, such as vomiting during exam period and near assignment deadlines. At the end of April 2023, I was referred to psychiatrist and there wasn't any effective way to relieve my symptoms before that.
As stated in the previous appeal letter, my situation has stabilized in September 2023. I started seeing an occupational therapist with a focus on time management, academic organization. I reduced my course load and learned useful skills in allocating works into staggered time periods to reduce the stress of approaching deadlines and exams. I will continue to meet with my psychiatrist and occupational therapist in Student Wellness, maintain the course load of 3-4 courses per semester and participate social activities to help maintain a positive state of mind.
I kindly request your patience and withhold the decision on my Second Level Appeal until I submit new supporting documents from my psychiatrist after February 8th. I also kindly request your understanding regarding the problem of my initial document in the First Level Appeal.
The circumstances of my initial appeal involved a sudden cancellation of the appointment by my psychiatrist on December 21st, the last day of Fall term. The cancellation email which I received at 8am on the day of appointment is provided as document to prove the situation is out of my control. This prompted me to seek assistance from a social worker at Student Wellness to get the documentation for First level Appeal in order to meet the deadline (December 31st). The social worker, whom I had never met before, provided documentation based on my past visits at Student Wellness. However, due to her unfamiliarity with me, the documentation lacks details and information regarding the impacts of my depression and anxiety on my Math121 course and my performance on exams.
In my Second Level Appeal, I aim to provide new and relevant documentation addressing the specific circumstances that influenced my MATH121 course and exams performance. However, since the time constraint to submit the Second Level Appeal is only 10 business days, and considering the availability of my mental health professional, I kindly request your understanding in waiting until February 10th for the submission of all the updated and comprehensive documentations. The earliest availability of my psychiatrist is on February 8th.
Initially, the final exams of Fall 2022(including MATH121) were usually taken in gyms or halls that held about 200-300 people, and the exposure to crowded places intensified my anxiety disorder. These exams took place before I registered and receiving support with QSAS, which allowed me to take exam in a smaller room.
In addition to my usual symptoms of depression and anxiety, such as difficulty in concentrating, memorizing, and comprehension, the increase of anxiety and depression caused me to exhibit physical symptoms of trembling on right hand and eating disorders, such as vomiting during exam period and near assignment deadlines. At the end of April 2023, I was referred to psychiatrist and there wasn't any effective way to relieve my symptoms before that.
As stated in the previous appeal letter, my situation has stabilized in September 2023. I started seeing an occupational therapist with a focus on time management, academic organization. I reduced my course load and learned useful skills in allocating works into staggered time periods to reduce the stress of approaching deadlines and exams. I will continue to meet with my psychiatrist and occupational therapist in Student Wellness, maintain the course load of 3-4 courses per semester and participate social activities to help maintain a positive state of mind.
I kindly request your patience and withhold the decision on my Second Level Appeal until I submit new supporting documents from my psychiatrist after February 8th. I also kindly request your understanding regarding the problem of my initial document in the First Level Appeal.
Documentation
Document: Email screenshot.pdf
I plan to submit additional documentation at a later date: I plan to submit additional documentation on February 10th, due to limited availability with my psychiatrist. And I kindly request your patience to withhold the decision on my Second Level Appeal until I submit new supporting documents.
Level 2 Amendment
Appeal Type: Level 2 Amendment
ID: 264
Submitted: February 13, 2024 at 3:01:37 PM
Relevant Petition: 11348
New Information: Please only review the revised appeal letter submitted as Word document on today February 13th. Thank you for your understanding and patience in waiting those document.
Appeal Grounds
Appeals to the Board of Studies must include a letter based on one or more of the Grounds for Appeal (Appeal Regulation 3.4). What are the grounds you are basing your appeal on?
- The Associate Dean's decision did not follow the rules of procedural fairness. A breach of procedural fairness includes such things as the Associate Dean failed to:
- Make a reasonable decision in your appeal. A “reasonable” decision is one that is based on evidence, thought out and supported by facts and logical inferences from the facts. To be reasonable, the decision must contain adequate reasons for the conclusions.
Documentation
Document: SWS Visit List-QSAS Confirm Email.pdf

