Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 13519
Submitted: September 9, 2025 at 3:59:31 PM
First Name: Mason
Last Name: Lange
Pronoun: he/him
Student Number: 20373033
Email: 22mkl1@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: Joint Honours: HIST & POLS
Level of Study: 4
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request to take more than 6.0 units of courses on a letter of permission through another institution
Petition Letter
Petition Letter: To the Associate Dean,
I am Mason Lange, and I am petitioning to transfer more than the allotted 6 credits via the ILOP. In Summer 2024, I had the privilege to attend the NATO Field School administered by Simon Fraser University. This is a roughly seven-week course where we studied the operation of NATO in cities like Riga, Rome, and Brussels. We interacted with prominent national figures such as the Latvian Minister of Foreign Affairs and high-ranking individuals in NATO, such as the (now) former Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg. The program also included two major simulations where we role-played NATO bodies such as the North Atlantic Council.
This course offers a unique opportunity to better understand how NATO functions. We visited many of NATO’s most important installations and grounds, including Joint Force Command (JFC) Brunssum, JFC Naples, and NATO Headquarters. Being able to meet the people who are truly involved in policy formation and diplomacy allowed me to truly understand the intricacies of International Relations. Unfortunately, Queen’s does not offer an equivalent program, so I jumped on the opportunity to do this through SFU.
I am submitting an Academic Petition retroactively because I was unaware that I was supposed to submit one before I took this course. Afterwards, I researched the steps required to transfer credits in this manner. I recently spoke to my academic advisor and the ILOP department to make sure I completed the process properly and in its entirety.
I am Mason Lange, and I am petitioning to transfer more than the allotted 6 credits via the ILOP. In Summer 2024, I had the privilege to attend the NATO Field School administered by Simon Fraser University. This is a roughly seven-week course where we studied the operation of NATO in cities like Riga, Rome, and Brussels. We interacted with prominent national figures such as the Latvian Minister of Foreign Affairs and high-ranking individuals in NATO, such as the (now) former Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg. The program also included two major simulations where we role-played NATO bodies such as the North Atlantic Council.
This course offers a unique opportunity to better understand how NATO functions. We visited many of NATO’s most important installations and grounds, including Joint Force Command (JFC) Brunssum, JFC Naples, and NATO Headquarters. Being able to meet the people who are truly involved in policy formation and diplomacy allowed me to truly understand the intricacies of International Relations. Unfortunately, Queen’s does not offer an equivalent program, so I jumped on the opportunity to do this through SFU.
I am submitting an Academic Petition retroactively because I was unaware that I was supposed to submit one before I took this course. Afterwards, I researched the steps required to transfer credits in this manner. I recently spoke to my academic advisor and the ILOP department to make sure I completed the process properly and in its entirety.
Academic Plan
Academic Plan: Transfer credits from the NATO Field School have been evaluated, in the past, as six credits of POLS 3UNS and six credits of POLS 4UNS. Both of these would fit into my degree program and satisfy a couple of my graduation requirements. For my POLS medial, I need a further six credits of POLS 400-level and three credits of POLS 200-level or higher. If this course transfers as it has previously, that would satisfy my requirements and more.
This course was the most rigorous seven weeks of academic study in my life. Most days started before eight in the morning and often stretched to five or even seven in the evenings. Especially during the two weeks when we worked on simulations. In both cases, we were tasked with preparing statements, developing policy platforms, and debating others in the program in meetings modeled on future NATO policy. POLS 400-level is made up of seminars that stress the importance of independent research and one’s ability to argue a point. I feel that the simulations I did during the NATO Field School embody this and, in some ways, are more rigorous than a traditional seminar. Much like Model Parliament or Model UN, the participants were encouraged to put themselves in the minds of certain countries or individuals. During the culminating simulation, I was placed as the Polish representative to NATO, and I had to truly understand what the Polish government would want out of a NATO summit.
Other portions of the program were more focused on lecture content. One that sticks out to me was a lecture on nuclear policy from the head of the Nuclear Planning Group. He discussed NATO’s policy on nuclear weapons and how strategic changes during the Ukrainian-Russian war could affect this. We also had lectures from military officials, such as the head of Task Force Latvia, who is in charge of managing the Multinational Brigade based out of Adazi, Latvia. He discussed the structure of the operation along with their readiness level and future expansion plans.
Not only did we complete coursework during the seven-week program, but we also wrote and produced a podcast afterwards. My group’s podcast was nearly 45 minutes long and was structured as a debate between our different members. The goal was to encourage the Canadian public they should care more about our contributions to NATO and our commitment to defending Latvia.
This course was the most rigorous seven weeks of academic study in my life. Most days started before eight in the morning and often stretched to five or even seven in the evenings. Especially during the two weeks when we worked on simulations. In both cases, we were tasked with preparing statements, developing policy platforms, and debating others in the program in meetings modeled on future NATO policy. POLS 400-level is made up of seminars that stress the importance of independent research and one’s ability to argue a point. I feel that the simulations I did during the NATO Field School embody this and, in some ways, are more rigorous than a traditional seminar. Much like Model Parliament or Model UN, the participants were encouraged to put themselves in the minds of certain countries or individuals. During the culminating simulation, I was placed as the Polish representative to NATO, and I had to truly understand what the Polish government would want out of a NATO summit.
Other portions of the program were more focused on lecture content. One that sticks out to me was a lecture on nuclear policy from the head of the Nuclear Planning Group. He discussed NATO’s policy on nuclear weapons and how strategic changes during the Ukrainian-Russian war could affect this. We also had lectures from military officials, such as the head of Task Force Latvia, who is in charge of managing the Multinational Brigade based out of Adazi, Latvia. He discussed the structure of the operation along with their readiness level and future expansion plans.
Not only did we complete coursework during the seven-week program, but we also wrote and produced a podcast afterwards. My group’s podcast was nearly 45 minutes long and was structured as a debate between our different members. The goal was to encourage the Canadian public they should care more about our contributions to NATO and our commitment to defending Latvia.
Documentation
Professional Letter Detail: NO DOC
Documentation Detail: NO DOC
Decision Letters
History
Originally submitted September 9, 2025 at 3:59:31 PM.
| Field | Reference | Old Value | New Value | Note | User | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| status | N/A | Received | In Review | Kerri Andrews | 2025-10-02 11:17:09 AM | |
| status | N/A | In Review | Granted | Kerri Andrews | 2025-10-07 11:36:40 AM | |
| associate_dean | N/A | Dorit Naaman (Associate Dean Academic) | Kerri Andrews | 2025-10-07 11:36:40 AM | ||
| decision_letter | N/A | N/A | Decision letter sent | Kerri Andrews | 2025-10-07 11:36:50 AM |

