Manage Appeals
Petition Type: New
ID: 13769
Submitted: December 10, 2025 at 10:06:00 AM
First Name: charlotte
Last Name: taylor
Pronoun: she her
Student Number: 20415338
Email: 22gkv@queensu.ca
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: PPE
Level of Study: 3
Petition Categories
Petition Categories: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Code: ECON 241
Term: Fall
Year: 2025
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: Raymond De Souza
Component: Assignment 2
Petition Letter
Petition Letter: I am writing to request a formal grade review of my Assignment 2 based on rubric application concerns, insufficient explanation for the assigned grade, and information resolution tried but unsuccessful. The rubric states that a good assignment must: clearly answer the assigned question, identify and apply the relevant concepts, demonstrate understanding of the readings and lectures (for clarity, the lecture we were intended to use was based on the two assigned readings, so I cited specific page numbers from the readings), and apply those concepts to the issue at hand. During my conversation over Zoom with the TA after receiving my grade, he confirmed that my assignment met these criteria, and offered no further feedback in these areas. The only feedback he was able to give me was that my assignment was lacking originality/creativity (corresponding to the “excellent assignment” range in the rubric). The assignment did not specify a relative grading system, yet in my correspondence with the TA, he explained that my grade was determined relative to other submissions, not strictly according to the rubric criteria supplied to us. I have attached correspondence with the TA where he confirmed this. This suggests a discrepancy between the written rubric and the grading method. The TA was able to give me no further explanation as to how 28 points were deducted. The professor was unable to give me any feedback on my mark and advised me that only the TA can give me information/reassessment, but I have been unable to get into contact with the TA. My correspondence with the TA, which is attached, led to him requesting a highlighted document demonstrating originality in order to gain points in the “excellent assignment” range. I did so and sent the highlighted document which showed original reasoning within the boundaries of the assignment, which required the use of assigned readings rather than external research, but he never replied. I respectfully request that the assignment be reviewed by an independent marker, following the rubric as written. I believe the current grade does not accurately reflect the quality of the work according to the stated criteria. Thank you for your time and consideration. I would be happy to provide any additional information if needed.
Documentation
Document: Assignment Prompt and Rubric-0.pdf
Document: emails with TA-0.pdf
Document: Course Outline E241 Fall 2025-0.docx
Document: ASSIGNMENT 2.pdf

