Submit an Academic Petition or Appeal

Manage Appeals

Petition Type: New
ID: 9913
Submitted: January 7, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM
First Name: Shiyue
Last Name: Lin
Student Number: 20252384
Degree Program: BAH
Plan: ECON&PHIL
Level of Study: 4

Petition Categories

Petition Categories: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Code: ECON 485
Term: Fall
Year: 2022
Petition Category: Request a review of instructors' decisions on grading of final examination and/or term work
Instructor's Name: Raymond de Souza
Component: Class Discussion & Final Paper

Petition Letter

Petition Letter: Given the class discussion grade, since I have attended all the classes and did my best to participate in every discussion, I am really confused with the grade of 10/16 as Professor Raymond said the default grade is 12/15 in our very first class meeting. The Professor's explanation of this is quite vague. I cannot understand giving such a score by default, but there is a reverse deduction of points for contribution. The syllabus, as the basis for assessing performance in class, should be rigorously and clearly written and followed. The syllabus should be seen as our consensus and commitment to the class. Any changes should be clearly declared in advance, but we have not seen any clues about process evaluation until the final grade came out. Unfortunately, I also cannot see the respect for this commitment in the professor's response emails. The effort I put into this course is evident to other students in our class. As an international student, I admit that I could not keep up with the pace of every native speaker at the beginning of the class, so I actively reached out to my classmates after classes to discuss our critical thoughts on the topics. At the same time, I actively looked for opportunities to have more face-to-face communication with Professor Raymond. My classmates also felt that I made significant progress. A rigorous academic classroom requires an atmosphere of diversity and inclusion but does not include the blurring of grading rules. Even if I am given back just one default point, I feel that my efforts are recognized. In addition, since Professor Raymond was unable to provide definite office hours, I contact Professor Raymond after class by email. However, he never showed up at the appointed time. The waiting time varies from forty minutes to nearly two hours each time. I could only sit on the cold ground in front of the professor's office, missing my other courses. We, students, cannot see any respect for students' time.

Another unacceptable aspect is that Professor Raymond never updates any feedback on OnQ site. During the whole semester, we did not get any improvement directions until the final grade was posted on the SOLUS. The class had no idea about the grading scale for presentations and class discussions. After each presentation, we were left to guess at the professor's facial expressions and use that as a criterion to prepare for the next class and presentation. This caused huge psychological stress for me, who had never written and presented such a large paper before, and I often fell into a deep sense of self-doubt. However, the essence of education is to inspire thought rather than to plunge students into deep self-doubt.

As for the assignment, my ability of typing was severely limited by severe flu and cervical symptoms throughout the final period. Even right before I turned in my paper, I was still seeking help from doctors. The doctor in Student Wellness Centre recommended physical therapy and sent an email for me to issue the proof for academic consideration. I tried repeatedly to contact physical therapy but haven't received any reply. At the same time, I was under double mental stress as my grandparents were experiencing very serious COVID infection. My parents at home also began to suffer from high fever and no one could take care of the elders, and I had to contact my parents overnight to coordinate the consultation with their doctors. In my very poor mental and physical state, the professor was not sympathetic and only gave me two days. I had no choice but to submit the first draft of my paper, which greatly limited my expression. I followed the faculty's guidelines to apply for academic consideration, but I did not feel any understanding from Professor Raymond. For me, sick in bed and vomiting, the extended two-day period only added to the enormous psychological pressure. Given my respect for the deadline, I had no choice but to turn in the assignment to the department in the snowstorm. However, I still received a penalty. Although Professor Raymond said he will fix this, he put all the blame on me for sending him the emails and requests and said Please do no send any further emails about this. As such, I cannot feel any basic respect for this.

Queen's University has always had a global reputation for a rigorous school culture, which is the reason why I chose to spend my four most valuable years at Queen's. I have always believed that Queen's is an inclusive and supportive community that strives for common academic ideals. However, what I encountered in this class made it hard for me to feel respect for academic rules and care for students. I am very sorry and disappointed about this.

Documentation

Professional Letter: Medication Prescription.pdf
Professional Letter Detail: The doctor said at the time of my visit that he was sending a proof for academic consideration separately to the Faculty Office.

Amendments to Appeal 9913

Petition Type: 2
ID: 9915
Submitted: January 7, 2023 at 4:29:31 AM
Relevant Petition: 9913
Student Number: 20252384

Documentation

Professional Letter Detail: NO DOC
Petition Type: 2
ID: 9916
Submitted: January 7, 2023 at 8:48:13 PM
Relevant Petition: 9913
New Information: On top of that, Father Raymond only started a few classes on time all semester, often arriving fifteen minutes late. Each class was almost over after everyone's presentation, and we rarely had time to react and think. Each class was conducted in a very hurried manner, which greatly affected the effectiveness of the learning. In addition, because each classroom at Queen's requires preparation about fifteen minutes in advance for the next class that will occupy the classroom, the average class duration is often only less than an hour, including the professor's late arrival time. I used to spend a lot of time preparing for class discussions, but I still did not have enough time to organize my words and express my thoughts completely in class. There were even scheduled presentations that were rescheduled for the next class due to the lack of time. The overall quality of the seminars was greatly compromised. Professor Raymond's requirements for participation were also never made public and there was absolutely no standard to follow. I just cannot understand how such a professor who holds such a teaching attitude can still be such a harsh judgment on the volume and quality of our presentations. In the rush of every class, no one's ideas were fully expressed. No one in the class knew what the standard of satisfactory but not superior quality was.
Student Number: 20252384

Documentation

Professional Letter Detail: NO DOC
Petition Type: 2
ID: 9918
Submitted: January 7, 2023 at 11:59:41 PM
Relevant Petition: 9913
New Information: Given the challenging situation, I hope that UNI can assess the evaluation as non-bias and fully recognize students' efforts. Students come to study and also aim to achieve a fair grade for future academic development.
Student Number: 20252384

Documentation

Professional Letter Detail: Evidence could be double-check by UNI CCTV on Professor Raymond's arrival time.
Select a decision letter template to generate and queue a decision letter using its content.

History

Originally submitted January 7, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM.

FieldReferenceOld ValueNew ValueNoteUserDate/Time
statusN/AReceivedIncompleteSpring Forsberg2023-01-09 9:04:49 AM
statusN/AIncompleteDeniedSpring Forsberg2023-02-13 10:24:54 AM
associate_deanN/AJenn Stephenson, Ph.D.Spring Forsberg2023-02-13 10:24:54 AM
decision_letterN/AN/ADecision letter sentSpring Forsberg2023-02-13 10:31:02 AM