Decision Letter
Appeal Number: 1805
Decision Date: July 13, 2016
Associate Dean: Johanne Benard, Ph.D.
Student Name: Gabrielle Gaeto
Student Email: 12gg31@queensu.ca
Course: SOCY 210
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Course: SOCY 275
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Stephen Baron
Course: ENSC 290
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Steven Moore
Course: GEOL 106
Term: Winter
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: John Hanes
Course: SPAN 204
Term: Fall
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Judit Luengo Martinelli
Course: HIST 125
Term: Fall/Winter
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Scott McLean
Dear Ms. Gaeto:
I have carefully considered your request to have your appeal heard after the 21-day timeline for submission. After reviewing your file I have decided to deny your request.
The appeal timeline is in place to give students sufficient time to respond to an academic decision. The 21-day timeline offers students time to seek academic counseling, to write up and submit an appeal, and to collect the supporting documents necessary to the appeal. Further, the appeal timeline is in place to ensure that decision making takes place in a timely manner, allowing students to continue in their academic programs without ongoing concern for unresolved matters.
To consider appeals outside these timelines can easily compromise fair decision making. The interested parties and the original contexts within which the matter originated may not be available. Over time, instructors, course content, the norms of evaluating course materials, and program structures may and generally do change. Furthermore, the supporting documents necessary to any appeal may no longer be available or their credibility may more easily come into question. Therefore, the inability to reconstruct accurately the circumstances leading to the original matter under appeal can compromise the decision-making process.
Exceptions to this regulation can only be granted in cases where extenuating circumstances beyond a student's control render the student unable to appeal within the specified timeline. The student must be able to show that the extenuating circumstances were ongoing. The student must also be able to demonstrate that these circumstances prevented the student from acting between the time the original decision was received and the time at which the appeal was eventually initiated. Appeals of the regulation governing the timeline for appeals must be submitted in writing. An appeal of this type should include a presentation of the specific reasons for a delay and should include any document which support the reasons for delay. Unfortunately, we did not receive any documentation from RARC to confirm the timeline and diagnosis of your learning disability. Without such documentation, I cannot accept an appeal beyond the deadline.
If you wish to appeal the Associate Dean€™s decision to the Board of Studies, you must submit an appeal to the Board of Studies within 21 days of the date this decision was sent. Guidelines for appealing to the Board of Studies and the appeal form can be found at: http://www.queensu.ca/artsci/students-at-queens/academic-appeals (click on €œBoard of Studies€) Do not use the on-line application for this process. You may contact Mr. Harry Smith, Office of the Ombudsman for advice on matters of procedure and on obtaining a representative. His office is located in room 421 Robert Sutherland Hall and he can be reached by phone (533-6495) or e-mail (ombuds@queensu.ca).
Sincerely,
Johanne Bénard, Ph.D.
Associate Dean (Studies)
10098045Gaeto2
Decision Date: July 13, 2016
Associate Dean: Johanne Benard, Ph.D.
Student Name: Gabrielle Gaeto
Student Email: 12gg31@queensu.ca
Course: SOCY 210
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Drop a course after the academic deadline
Course: SOCY 275
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Stephen Baron
Course: ENSC 290
Term: Fall
Year: 2015
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Steven Moore
Course: GEOL 106
Term: Winter
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: John Hanes
Course: SPAN 204
Term: Fall
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Judit Luengo Martinelli
Course: HIST 125
Term: Fall/Winter
Year: 2014
Category: Request credit (CR) standing in a course or courses
Instructor: Scott McLean
Dear Ms. Gaeto:
I have carefully considered your request to have your appeal heard after the 21-day timeline for submission. After reviewing your file I have decided to deny your request.
The appeal timeline is in place to give students sufficient time to respond to an academic decision. The 21-day timeline offers students time to seek academic counseling, to write up and submit an appeal, and to collect the supporting documents necessary to the appeal. Further, the appeal timeline is in place to ensure that decision making takes place in a timely manner, allowing students to continue in their academic programs without ongoing concern for unresolved matters.
To consider appeals outside these timelines can easily compromise fair decision making. The interested parties and the original contexts within which the matter originated may not be available. Over time, instructors, course content, the norms of evaluating course materials, and program structures may and generally do change. Furthermore, the supporting documents necessary to any appeal may no longer be available or their credibility may more easily come into question. Therefore, the inability to reconstruct accurately the circumstances leading to the original matter under appeal can compromise the decision-making process.
Exceptions to this regulation can only be granted in cases where extenuating circumstances beyond a student's control render the student unable to appeal within the specified timeline. The student must be able to show that the extenuating circumstances were ongoing. The student must also be able to demonstrate that these circumstances prevented the student from acting between the time the original decision was received and the time at which the appeal was eventually initiated. Appeals of the regulation governing the timeline for appeals must be submitted in writing. An appeal of this type should include a presentation of the specific reasons for a delay and should include any document which support the reasons for delay. Unfortunately, we did not receive any documentation from RARC to confirm the timeline and diagnosis of your learning disability. Without such documentation, I cannot accept an appeal beyond the deadline.
If you wish to appeal the Associate Dean€™s decision to the Board of Studies, you must submit an appeal to the Board of Studies within 21 days of the date this decision was sent. Guidelines for appealing to the Board of Studies and the appeal form can be found at: http://www.queensu.ca/artsci/students-at-queens/academic-appeals (click on €œBoard of Studies€) Do not use the on-line application for this process. You may contact Mr. Harry Smith, Office of the Ombudsman for advice on matters of procedure and on obtaining a representative. His office is located in room 421 Robert Sutherland Hall and he can be reached by phone (533-6495) or e-mail (ombuds@queensu.ca).
Sincerely,
Johanne Bénard, Ph.D.
Associate Dean (Studies)
10098045Gaeto2
Generated July 13, 2016 at 3:37:33 PM.